Targeted depletion of TCRα/β, CD45RA or CD3/CD19 T cells in graft engineering

Active T cell depletion allows a focused depletion of unwanted cells, while several populations of potentially therapeutic beneficial cells are preserved within the graft. Take advantage of the innovative strategies on our proven CliniMACS® Instruments.

Active T cell depletion allows a focused depletion of unwanted cells, while several populations of potentially therapeutic beneficial cells are preserved within the graft. Different strategies can be applied, as described below.

CD3/CD19 depletion

In contrast to the strategy of CD34+ cell enrichment, active T and B cell depletion results in a graft that contains CD34+ stem cells, CD34stem cells, other progenitor cells and natural killer (NK) cells, monocytes, and dendritic cells, which might have engraftment facilitating effects1. This active T cell depletion strategy is currently being evaluated, especially in combination with reduced intensity conditioning2.

TCRα/β depletion

Another possibility for active T cell depletion is provided by the CliniMACS® TCRα/β System. 
Cells which are responsible for the development of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) are thought to derive from the pool of TCRα/β+ T cells, whereas TCRγ/δ+ T cells and NK cells may bear graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effects, engraftment facilitating functions, and may help to fight infections3-6.
Thus, depletion of TCRα/β+ T cells may be a helpful tool to prevent GvHD, while preserving different cell populations of potential therapeutic value within the cellular product7,8. The CliniMACS TCRα/β product line can also be used in combination with the CliniMACS CD19 Reagent to additionally remove the CD19+ B cells from the graft9.

Automated TCRα/β+ T cell depletion in stem cell transplants with the CliniMACS® TCRα/β System

Learn how TCRα/β and CD19 depletion is facilitated with the help of the CliniMACS Instruments.

CD45RA depletion

CD45RA is expressed on naive T cells, whereas memory T cells are CD45RA–. CD45RA depletion results in a cellular product passively enriched for memory T cells, while naive T cells, which have the potential to induce GvHD, are depleted10. The potential benefit of memory T cell infusion probably results from the high anti-infection potential of this cell type. It should be noted that CD45RA is also present on part of other lymphocytes and hematopoietic stem cells. This should be considered if memory T cell infusion is planned to be combined with the initial transplant. In exceptional cases it may happen that donors have CD45+ memory T cells. This should be tested prior to any clinical application.

Automated magnetic depletion of CD45RA+ naive T cells with the CliniMACS® CD45RA Reagents

Learn how CD45RA depletion is facilitated with the help of the CliniMACS Instruments.

Please find below a list of product lines that can be used for active T cell depletion.

CliniMACS® CD3/CD19 Product Line – For simultaneous T and B cell depletion.

CliniMACS TCRα/β Product Line – For TCRα/β+ T cell depletion. Aim: Maintenance of γ/δ T cells, NK cells, and graft facilitating cells in the graft. For additional removal of B cells, this product line can also be used in combination with CliniMACS CD19 Product Line.TCRα/β depletion is currently available as RUO (research use only) in the USA.

CliniMACS CD45RA Product Line For naive T cell depletion. Aim: Maintenance of memory T cells in the graft or DLI product. Part of CD34 hematopoietic stem cells are also CD45RA+. This should be considered if memory  cell infusion is planned to be combined with the initial transplant. In exceptional cases it may happen that donors have CD45+ memory T cells. This should be tested prior to any clinical application.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a therapeutic option for the treatment of patients with distinct malignant and non-malignant diseases.1,11

Active T cell depletion strategies can be used for haploidentical transplantation when an human leukocyte antigen (HLA) Id Sib or other HLA-matched related or unrelated donor is not available. CliniMACS technology enables the active depletion of B cells, T cells, or T cell subsets from the graft (CD3/CD19 depletion, TCRα/β/CD19 depletion). These depleted grafts have been used in the context of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens11-14.

CD3/CD19 depletion
Clinical investigation during recent years has focused on treatment of hematological malignancies but, to a certain extent, solid tumor disease and non-malignant disease have also been the subject of clinical studies15,16. Data have been acquired for patient populations, both children and adults, which demonstrate improved engraftment and immune reconstitution13,17-19. The authors conclude that CD3/CD19 depletion for graft engineering under RIC is a promising approach for patients without a matched related donor.

Especially children and elderly patients potentially benefit from the strategy of RIC. Recent findings show that a CD3/CD19 depletion graft engineering strategy for non-HLA identical donor stem cell transplantation in children resulted in a remarkable cumulative TRM rate of only 10.7% – a result which was previously only found in HLA Id Sib transplantation20.

TCRα/β/CD19 depletion
Results are accumulating on a most innovative active T cell depletion strategy, which is based on TCRα/β/CD19 depletion of HLA-mismatched stem cell grafts for treatment of children with advanced malignant and non-malignant disease under RIC14,21. Patients showed a rapid and sustained engraftment, a rapid immune reconstitution, and a low incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). More recent data show that promising data could be generated not only on the basis of RIC but also after myeloablative conditioning, even when no post-transplant GvHD prophylaxis was administered9.

  1. Handgretinger, R. et al. (2007) Feasibility and outcome of reduced-intensity conditioning in haploidentical transplantation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1106: 279–289.
  2. Schumm, M. et al. (2006) Determination of residual T- and B-cell content after immunomagnetic depletion: proposal for flow cytometric analysis and results from 103 separations. Cytotherapy 8: 465–472.
  3. D’Asaro, M. et al. (2010) V gamma 9V delta 2 T lymphocytes efficiently recognize and kill zoledronate-sensitized, imatinib-sensitive, and imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia cells. J. Immunol. 184: 3260–3268.
  4. Kordelas, L. et al. (2008) Improved overall survival in patients recovering with high gamma/delta T cells after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood 112: Abstract 2223.
  5. Godder, K.T. et al. (2007) Long term disease-free survival in acute leukemia patients recovering with increased gammadelta T cells after partially mismatched related donor bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 39: 751–757.
  6. Knight, A. et al. (2010) The role of Vδ2-negative γδ T cells during cytomegalovirus reactivation in recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood 116: 2164–2172.
  7. Lang, P. et al. (2015) Improved immune recovery after transplantation of TCRαβ/CD19-depleted allografts from haploidentical donors in pediatric patients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 50 Suppl 2:S6–10.
  8. Shah, R. et al. (2018) T-cell receptor αβ+ and CD19+ cell-depleted haploidentical and mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in primary immune deficiency. J Allergy Clin. Immunol. 141: 1417–1426.
  9. Handgretinger, R. et al. (2011) Transplantation of TcRαβ/CD19 Depleted Stem Cells From Haploidentical Donors: Robust Engraftment and Rapid Immune Reconstitution In Children with High Risk Leukemia. Blood 118: Abstract 1005.
  10. Bleakley, M.  et al. (2014) Engineering human peripheral blood stem cell grafts that are depleted of naïve T cells and retain functional pathogen-specific memory T cells. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 20: 705–716.
  11. The EBMT Handbook 6th Edition, Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, 2012.
  12. Gonzalez-Vicent, M. et al. (2010) Graft manipulation and reduced-intensity conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from mismatched unrelated and mismatched/haploidentical related donors in pediatric leukemia patients. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 32: 85–90.
  13. Lang, P. et al. (2005) A comparison between three graft manipulation methods for haploidentical stem cell transplantation in pediatric patients: preliminary results of a pilot study. Klin. Padiatr. 217: 334–348.
  14. Lang, P. et al. (2011) Bone Marrow Transplant. 46 (Suppl. 1): 559.
  15. Handgretinger, R. et al. (2008) The history and future prospective of haplo-identical stem cell transplantation. Cytotherapy. 10: 443–451.
  16. Lang, P. et al. (2008) Bone Marrow Transplant. 42 (Suppl. 2): 54–59.
  17. Bethge, W. A. et al. (2008) Haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in adults using CD3/CD19 depletion and reduced intensity conditioning: an update. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 40: 13–19.
  18. Federmann et al. (2009) Bone Marrow Transplant. 43 (Suppl. 1): S66.
  19. Federmann, B. et al. (2011) Immune reconstitution after haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation: impact of reduced intensity conditioning and CD3/CD19 depleted grafts. Leukemia 25: 121–129.
  20. Bader, P. et al. (2011) Rapid immune recovery and low TRM in haploidentical stem cell transplantation in children and adolescence using CD3/CD19-depleted stem cells. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Hematol. 24: 331–337.
  21. Schumm, M. et al. (2011) Bone Marrow Transplant. 46 (Suppl. 1): 1093.

Related information

Unless otherwise specifically indicated, Miltenyi Biotec products and services are for research use only and not for therapeutic or diagnostic use. For complete regulatory notes, please click here.

Seems like you are coming from USA!
Do you want to visit our website in your country?